³1username³2LarrySanger³2name³2text_default³2version³21³2ts³2980069653³2ip³224.234.246.58³2data³2newauthor³31³3minor³30³3text³3Patent nonsense, particularly on a wiki, falls into a just few general categories:

* Literal nonsense, i.e., text that, usually intentionally, has no assignable meaning at all.  This tends to be created after the consumption of too much adult beverage, for example, or under the influence of immaturity and/or stupidity.
* Stuff that, while apparently meaningful after a fashion, is so completely and irremediably confused that no intelligent person can be expected to try to make heads or tails of it.

The following, while often regrettable, is not patent nonsense, and therefore according to a proposed rule on the WikiPediaProcess page, should not for ''that'' reason be deleted (but some suggestions for improvement are included):
* Really badly-written stuff.  (So correct it.)
* Partisan screed.  (Make it hedged or add qualifications in order to make it less biased.)
* Religious excogitations.  (Make it factual.  Yes, there are ways of doing this; e.g., add phrases like "Followers of X hold that...")
* Mere opinion, masquerading as fact.  (Remove it to an appropriately-named page, or reword in order to make it fact-stating.)
* Incompetent and/or immature stuff.  (Well, it's not nonsense but perhaps it does deserve to be greatly improved.)
³3summary³3*³2tscreate³2980069653³2keepts³2980069775³2id³21001³2host³2dhcp058.246.lvcm.com³2revision³21³1username³2LarrySanger³2name³2text_default³2version³21³2ts³2980069775³2ip³224.234.246.58³2data³2text³3Patent nonsense, particularly on a wiki, falls into a just few general categories:

* Literal nonsense, i.e., text that, usually intentionally, has no assignable meaning at all.  This tends to be created after the consumption of too much adult beverage, for example, or under the influence of immaturity and/or stupidity.
* Stuff that, while apparently meaningful after a fashion, is so completely and irremediably confused that no intelligent person can be expected to try to make heads or tails of it.

The following, while often regrettable, is not patent nonsense, and therefore according to a proposed rule on the WikiPediaProcess page, should not for ''that'' reason be deleted (but some suggestions for improvement are included):
* Really badly-written stuff.  (So correct it.)
* Partisan screed.  (Make it hedged or add qualifications in order to make it less biased.)
* Religious excogitations.  (Make it factual.  Yes, there are ways of doing this; e.g., add phrases like "Followers of X hold that...")
* Mere opinion, masquerading as fact.  (Remove it to an appropriately-named page, or reword in order to make it fact-stating.)
* Incompetent and/or immature stuff.  (Well, it's not nonsense, but perhaps it does deserve to be greatly improved.  So improve it.)
³3minor³30³3newauthor³30³3summary³3*³2tscreate³2980069653³2keepts³2980069906³2id³21001³2host³2dhcp058.246.lvcm.com³2revision³22³1username³2³2name³2text_default³2version³21³2ts³2980069906³2ip³2203.56.239.113³2data³2newauthor³31³3minor³30³3text³3Patent nonsense, particularly on a wiki, falls into a just few general categories:

* Literal nonsense, i.e., text that, usually intentionally, has no assignable meaning at all.  This tends to be created after the consumption of too much adult beverage, for example, or under the influence of immaturity and/or stupidity.
* Stuff that, while apparently meaningful after a fashion, is so completely and irremediably confused that no intelligent person can be expected to try to make heads or tails of it.

The following, while often regrettable, is not patent nonsense, and therefore according to a proposed rule on the WikiPediaProcess page, should not for ''that'' reason be deleted (but some suggestions for improvement are included):
* Really badly-written stuff.  (So correct it.)
* Partisan screed.  (Make it hedged or add qualifications in order to make it less biased.)
* Religious excogitations.  (Make it factual.  Yes, there are ways of doing this; e.g., add phrases like "Followers of X hold that...")
* Mere opinion, masquerading as fact.  (Remove it to an appropriately-named page, or reword in order to make it fact-stating.)
* Incompetent and/or immature stuff.  (Well, it's not nonsense, but perhaps it does deserve to be greatly improved.  So improve it.)

SO, you are really looking for Chaos on a webpage, right?
³3summary³3*³2tscreate³2980069653³2keepts³2980070681³2id³2111³2host³2proxy3.senet.com.au³2revision³23³1username³2LarrySanger³2name³2text_default³2version³21³2ts³2980070681³2ip³224.234.246.58³2data³2text³3Patent nonsense, particularly on a wiki, falls into a just few general categories:

* Literal nonsense, i.e., text that, usually intentionally, has no assignable meaning at all.  This tends to be created after the consumption of too much adult beverage, for example, or under the influence of immaturity and/or stupidity.
* Stuff that, while apparently meaningful after a fashion, is so completely and irremediably confused that no intelligent person can be expected to try to make heads or tails of it.

The following, while often regrettable, is not patent nonsense, and therefore according to a proposed rule on the WikiPediaProcess page, should not for ''that'' reason be deleted (but some suggestions for improvement are included):
* Really badly-written stuff.  (So correct it.)
* Partisan screed.  (Make it hedged or add qualifications in order to make it less biased.)
* Religious excogitations.  (Make it factual.  Yes, there are ways of doing this; e.g., add phrases like "Followers of X hold that...")
* Mere opinion, masquerading as fact.  (Remove it to an appropriately-named page, or reword in order to make it fact-stating.)
* Incompetent and/or immature stuff.  (Well, it's not nonsense, but perhaps it does deserve to be greatly improved.  So improve it.)
----
SO, you are really looking for Chaos on a webpage, right?

Er...no, we'd like to avoid it.
³3minor³30³3newauthor³31³3summary³3*³2tscreate³2980069653³2keepts³2980070751³2id³21001³2host³2dhcp058.246.lvcm.com³2revision³24³1username³2³2name³2text_default³2version³21³2ts³2980070751³2ip³2203.56.239.200³2data³2newauthor³31³3minor³30³3text³3Patent nonsense, particularly on a wiki, falls into a just few general categories:

* Literal nonsense, i.e., text that, usually intentionally, has no assignable meaning at all.  This tends to be created after the consumption of too much adult beverage, for example, or under the influence of immaturity and/or stupidity.
* Stuff that, while apparently meaningful after a fashion, is so completely and irremediably confused that no intelligent person can be expected to try to make heads or tails of it.

The following, while often regrettable, is not patent nonsense, and therefore according to a proposed rule on the WikiPediaProcess page, should not for ''that'' reason be deleted (but some suggestions for improvement are included):
* Really badly-written stuff.  (So correct it.)
* Partisan screed.  (Make it hedged or add qualifications in order to make it less biased.)
* Religious excogitations.  (Make it factual.  Yes, there are ways of doing this; e.g., add phrases like "Followers of X hold that...")
* Mere opinion, masquerading as fact.  (Remove it to an appropriately-named page, or reword in order to make it fact-stating.)
* Incompetent and/or immature stuff.  (Well, it's not nonsense, but perhaps it does deserve to be greatly improved.  So improve it.)
----
SO, you are really looking for Chaos on a webpage, right?

Er...no, we'd like to avoid it.

K, how is that going to happen without a policeman?
³3summary³3*³2tscreate³2980069653³2keepts³2980070895³2id³2111³2host³2proxy4.senet.com.au³2revision³25³1username³2LarrySanger³2name³2text_default³2version³21³2ts³2980070895³2ip³224.234.246.58³2data³2text³3Patent nonsense, particularly on a wiki, falls into a just few general categories:

* Literal nonsense, i.e., text that, usually intentionally, has no assignable meaning at all.  This tends to be created after the consumption of too much adult beverage, for example, or under the influence of immaturity and/or stupidity.
* Stuff that, while apparently meaningful after a fashion, is so completely and irremediably confused that no intelligent person can be expected to try to make heads or tails of it.

The following, while often regrettable, is not patent nonsense, and therefore according to a proposed rule on the WikiPediaProcess page, should not for ''that'' reason be deleted (but some suggestions for improvement are included):
* Really badly-written stuff.  (So correct it.)
* Partisan screed.  (Make it hedged or add qualifications in order to make it less biased.)
* Religious excogitations.  (Make it factual.  Yes, there are ways of doing this; e.g., add phrases like "Followers of X hold that...")
* Mere opinion, masquerading as fact.  (Remove it to an appropriately-named page, or reword in order to make it fact-stating.)
* Incompetent and/or immature stuff.  (Well, it's not nonsense, but perhaps it does deserve to be greatly improved.  So improve it.)
----
SO, you are really looking for Chaos on a webpage, right?

Er...no, we'd like to avoid it.

K, how is that going to happen without a policeman?

Go figure!
³3minor³30³3newauthor³31³3summary³3*³2tscreate³2980069653³2keepts³2980118719³2id³21001³2host³2dhcp058.246.lvcm.com³2revision³26³1username³2LarrySanger³2name³2text_default³2version³21³2ts³2980118719³2ip³224.234.246.58³2data³2newauthor³30³3minor³31³3text³3Patent nonsense, particularly on a wiki, falls into a just few general categories:

* Literal nonsense, i.e., text that, usually intentionally, has no assignable meaning at all.  This tends to be created after the consumption of too much adult beverage, for example, or under the influence of immaturity and/or stupidity.
* Stuff that, while apparently meaningful after a fashion, is so completely and irremediably confused that no intelligent person can be expected to try to make heads or tails of it.

The following, while often regrettable, is not patent nonsense, and therefore according to a proposed rule on the WikiPediaProcess page, should not for ''that'' reason be deleted (but some suggestions for improvement are included):
* Really badly-written stuff.  (So correct it.)
* Partisan screed.  (Make it hedged or add qualifications in order to make it less biased.)
* Religious excogitations.  (Make it factual.  Yes, there are ways of doing this; e.g., add phrases like "Followers of X hold that...")
* Mere opinion, masquerading as fact.  (Remove it to an appropriately-named page, or reword in order to make it fact-stating.)
* Incompetent and/or immature stuff.  (Well, it's not nonsense, but perhaps it does deserve to be greatly improved.  So improve it.)
----
Q. SO, you are really looking for Chaos on a webpage, right?

A. Er...no, we'd like to avoid it.

Q. K, how is that going to happen without a policeman?

A. Go figure!
³3summary³3*³2tscreate³2980069653³2keepts³2980121219³2id³21001³2host³2dhcp058.246.lvcm.com³2revision³27³1username³2LarrySanger³2name³2text_default³2version³21³2ts³2980121219³2ip³224.234.246.58³2data³2text³3Patent nonsense (to be carefully distinguished from BrilliantProse), particularly on a wiki, falls into a just few general categories:

* Literal nonsense, i.e., text that, usually intentionally, has no assignable meaning at all.  This tends to be created after the consumption of too much adult beverage, for example, or under the influence of immaturity and/or stupidity.
* Stuff that, while apparently meaningful after a fashion, is so completely and irremediably confused that no intelligent person can be expected to try to make heads or tails of it.

The following, while often regrettable, is not patent nonsense, and therefore according to a proposed rule on the WikiPediaProcess page, should not for ''that'' reason be deleted (but some suggestions for improvement are included):
* Really badly-written stuff.  (So correct it.)
* Partisan screed.  (Make it hedged or add qualifications in order to make it less biased.)
* Religious excogitations.  (Make it factual.  Yes, there are ways of doing this; e.g., add phrases like "Followers of X hold that...")
* Mere opinion, masquerading as fact.  (Remove it to an appropriately-named page, or reword in order to make it fact-stating.)
* Incompetent and/or immature stuff.  (Well, it's not nonsense, but perhaps it does deserve to be greatly improved.  So improve it.)
----
Q. SO, you are really looking for Chaos on a webpage, right?

A. Er...no, we'd like to avoid it.

Q. K, how is that going to happen without a policeman?

A. Go figure!
³3minor³31³3newauthor³30³3summary³3*³2tscreate³2980069653³2keepts³2980405191³2id³21001³2host³2dhcp058.246.lvcm.com³2revision³28³1username³2³2name³2text_default³2version³21³2ts³2980405191³2ip³2216.177.136.73³2data³2newauthor³31³3minor³30³3text³3Patent nonsense (to be carefully distinguished from BrilliantProse), particularly on a wiki, falls into a just few general categories:

* Literal nonsense, i.e., text that, usually intentionally, has no assignable meaning at all.  This tends to be created after the consumption of too much adult beverage, for example, or under the influence of immaturity and/or stupidity. (The writings of James Joyce being the obvious exception.)
* Stuff that, while apparently meaningful after a fashion, is so completely and irremediably confused that no intelligent person can be expected to try to make heads or tails of it.  (The writings of James Joyce being the obvious exception.)

The following, while often regrettable, is not patent nonsense, and therefore according to a proposed rule on the WikiPediaProcess page, should not for ''that'' reason be deleted (but some suggestions for improvement are included):
* Really badly-written stuff.  (So correct it.)
* Partisan screed.  (Make it hedged or add qualifications in order to make it less biased.)
* Religious excogitations.  (Make it factual.  Yes, there are ways of doing this; e.g., add phrases like "Followers of X hold that...")
* Mere opinion, masquerading as fact.  (Remove it to an appropriately-named page, or reword in order to make it fact-stating.)
* Incompetent and/or immature stuff.  (Well, it's not nonsense, but perhaps it does deserve to be greatly improved.  So improve it.)
----
Q. SO, you are really looking for Chaos on a webpage, right?

A. Er...no, we'd like to avoid it.

Q. K, how is that going to happen without a policeman?

A. Go figure!
³3summary³3added Joyce references³2tscreate³2980069653³2keepts³2980420112³2id³21063³2host³2tc-3-73.dynamic.minn.net³2revision³29³1username³2³2name³2text_default³2version³21³2ts³2980420112³2ip³263.252.224.202³2data³2text³3Patent nonsense (to be carefully distinguished from BrilliantProse as well as PrivateNonsense), particularly on a wiki, falls into a just few general categories:

* Literal nonsense, i.e., text that, usually intentionally, has no assignable meaning at all.  This tends to be created after the consumption of too much adult beverage, for example, or under the influence of immaturity and/or stupidity. (The writings of James Joyce being the obvious exception.)
* Stuff that, while apparently meaningful after a fashion, is so completely and irremediably confused that no intelligent person can be expected to try to make heads or tails of it.  (The writings of James Joyce being the obvious exception.)

The following, while often regrettable, is not patent nonsense, and therefore according to a proposed rule on the WikiPediaProcess page, should not for ''that'' reason be deleted (but some suggestions for improvement are included):
* Really badly-written stuff.  (So correct it.)
* Partisan screed.  (Make it hedged or add qualifications in order to make it less biased.)
* Religious excogitations.  (Make it factual.  Yes, there are ways of doing this; e.g., add phrases like "Followers of X hold that...")
* Mere opinion, masquerading as fact.  (Remove it to an appropriately-named page, or reword in order to make it fact-stating.)
* Incompetent and/or immature stuff.  (Well, it's not nonsense, but perhaps it does deserve to be greatly improved.  So improve it.)
----
Q. SO, you are really looking for Chaos on a webpage, right?

A. Er...no, we'd like to avoid it.

Q. K, how is that going to happen without a policeman?

A. Go figure!
³3minor³30³3newauthor³31³3summary³3*³2tscreate³2980069653³2keepts³2980532222³2id³2111³2host³2A010-1472.KSCY.splitrock.net³2revision³210