³1username³2³2name³2text_default³2version³21³2ts³2979690283³2ip³224.234.246.58³2data³2newauthor³31³3minor³30³3text³3The study of the methods and aims of PhiloSophy, consisting of a lot of questions that presuppose deeper questions in EpistemOlogy, PhilosophyOfLanguage, and other philosophical subdisciplines.  Paradoxically, better done after one has explored a lot of philosophy, rather than before.----Some might say this involves moving to a higher philosophical level, transcending ordinary thought, but others might hesitate to embrace the speculative nature of such efforts.
³3summary³3*³2tscreate³2979690283³2keepts³2980725246³2id³21001³2host³2dhcp058.246.lvcm.com³2revision³21³1username³2PhillipHankins³2name³2text_default³2version³21³2ts³2980725246³2ip³224.190.57.186³2data³2text³3The study of the methods and aims of PhiloSophy, consisting of a lot of questions that presuppose deeper questions in EpistemOlogy, PhilosophyOfLanguage, and other philosophical subdisciplines.  Paradoxically, better done after one has explored a lot of philosophy, rather than before.
----
Some might say this involves moving to a higher philosophical level, transcending ordinary thought, but others might hesitate to embrace the speculative nature of such efforts.
----
PhiloSophy of the 20th Century was characterized as being "talk about talk".  Taking that perspective, metaphilosophy would be "talk about talk about talk."  But this really just collases back to "talk about (a certain type of) talk."  So the regression wouldn't get very far, metaphilosophy would be seen as a subdomain of philosophy.  Which is not to say that the term would have no potiential for use.  Only that it references a subset, not a superset; not moving to "a higher philosophical level", just turning the ordinary level on itself.  --PhillipHankins
³3minor³30³3newauthor³31³3summary³3*³2tscreate³2979690283³2keepts³2980738710³2id³21156³2host³2ool-18be39ba.dyn.optonline.net³2revision³22