³1username³2JimboWales³2name³2text_default³2version³21³2ts³2982099039³2ip³2209.66.79.109³2data³2newauthor³31³3minor³30³3text³3JoshuaGrosse (I'm pretty sure it was him!) wrote on another page:

'In case anyone really doesn't know what anarcho-capitalism is supposed to be about, have a look at [http://dwardmac.pitzer.edu/dward/newrightanarchocap.htmlthis article]. '

This particular article isn't bad overall, but it might lead the reader to a few misconceptions.  First, the anarchocapitalism is not the 'house ideology' of the Libertarian Party.  No doubt there are some anarchists in the ranks of the LP, but as far as I know they do not dominate.

It should be noted that the author, MikeHuben, is best known on the Internet for his ''critique'' of libertarianism.
³3summary³3*³2tscreate³2982099039³2keepts³2982099585³2id³21025³2host³2cobrand.bomis.com³2revision³21³1username³2LarrySanger³2name³2text_default³2version³21³2ts³2982099585³2ip³2209.66.79.109³2data³2text³3Someone wrote on another page:

'In case anyone really doesn't know what anarcho-capitalism is supposed to be about, have a look at [http://dwardmac.pitzer.edu/dward/newrightanarchocap.html this article]. '

This particular article isn't bad overall, but it might lead the reader to a few misconceptions.  First, the anarchocapitalism is not the 'house ideology' of the Libertarian Party.  No doubt there are some anarchists in the ranks of the LP, but as far as I know they do not dominate.

It should be noted that the author, MikeHuben, is best known on the Internet for his ''critique'' of libertarianism.
³3minor³31³3newauthor³31³3summary³3*³2tscreate³2982099039³2keepts³2982100394³2id³21001³2host³2cobrand.bomis.com³2revision³22³1username³2JoshuaGrosse³2name³2text_default³2version³21³2ts³2982100394³2ip³2209.66.79.109³2data³2newauthor³31³3minor³30³3text³3Someone wrote on another page:

'In case anyone really doesn't know what anarcho-capitalism is supposed to be about, have a look at [http://dwardmac.pitzer.edu/dward/newrightanarchocap.html this article]. '

This particular article isn't bad overall, but it might lead the reader to a few misconceptions.  First, the anarchocapitalism is not the 'house ideology' of the Libertarian Party.  No doubt there are some anarchists in the ranks of the LP, but as far as I know they do not dominate.

It should be noted that the author, MikeHuben, is best known on the Internet for his ''critique'' of libertarianism.
----
Nothing wrong with critiques.  I find they're usually a better way of evaluating ideas: everyone will defend their own position eloquently, but you can only build a strong counter-attack against an idea with flaws.  So looking at how strong criticisms are usually gives you a better idea of how good the original was.
³3summary³3*³2tscreate³2982099039³2keepts³2982101385³2id³21076³2host³2cobrand.bomis.com³2revision³23³1username³2JimboWales³2name³2text_default³2version³21³2ts³2982101385³2ip³2209.66.79.109³2data³2text³3Someone wrote on another page:

'In case anyone really doesn't know what anarcho-capitalism is supposed to be about, have a look at [http://dwardmac.pitzer.edu/dward/newrightanarchocap.html this article]. '

This particular article isn't bad overall, but it might lead the reader to a few misconceptions.  First, the anarchocapitalism is not the 'house ideology' of the Libertarian Party.  No doubt there are some anarchists in the ranks of the LP, but as far as I know they do not dominate.

It should be noted that the author, MikeHuben, is best known on the Internet for his ''critique'' of libertarianism.
----
Nothing wrong with critiques.  I find they're usually a better way of evaluating ideas: everyone will defend their own position eloquently, but you can only build a strong counter-attack against an idea with flaws.  So looking at how strong criticisms are usually gives you a better idea of how good the original was.
----
I agree completely.  The only point, though, is that Huben may wish to tar libertarianism by association with AnarchoCapitalism.
³3minor³30³3newauthor³31³3summary³3*³2tscreate³2982099039³2keepts³2982115474³2id³21025³2host³2cobrand.bomis.com³2revision³24³1username³2RichardKulisz³2name³2text_default³2version³21³2ts³2982115474³2ip³2209.66.79.109³2data³2newauthor³31³3minor³30³3text³3Someone wrote on another page:

'In case anyone really doesn't know what anarcho-capitalism is supposed to be about, have a look at [http://dwardmac.pitzer.edu/dward/newrightanarchocap.html this article]. '

This particular article isn't bad overall, but it might lead the reader to a few misconceptions.  First, the anarchocapitalism is not the 'house ideology' of the Libertarian Party.  No doubt there are some anarchists in the ranks of the LP, but as far as I know they do not dominate.

It should be noted that the author, MikeHuben, is best known on the Internet for his ''critique'' of libertarianism.
----
Nothing wrong with critiques.  I find they're usually a better way of evaluating ideas: everyone will defend their own position eloquently, but you can only build a strong counter-attack against an idea with flaws.  So looking at how strong criticisms are usually gives you a better idea of how good the original was.
----
I agree completely.  The only point, though, is that Huben may wish to tar libertarianism by association with AnarchoCapitalism.

What does libertarianism mean in the above sentence? Does it refer to the right-libertarianism of the proponents of the Libertarian party or does it also include anarcho-syndicalists as left-libertarians? And what does right-libertarianism mean if one does not take it to be synonymous with AnarchoCapitalism?
³3summary³3*³2tscreate³2982099039³2keepts³2982121980³2id³21284³2host³2cobrand.bomis.com³2revision³25