Disputatio:Haeresis Ariana
E Vicipaedia
Seems to me that Haeresia Ariana or even Arianismus would be better. --Iustinus 18:22, 25 Ianuarii 2007 (UTC)
- There could be more than 1,500 years of Latin commentary on it, with ample attestations. Anybody got one at hand? IacobusAmor 18:26, 25 Ianuarii 2007 (UTC)
- Likewise any of dozens of other named heresies, including (off the top of my head) Antinomianism, Donatism, Jansenism, Marcionism, Monophysitism, Nestorianism, Pelagianism, and Sabellianism. Vicipaedia might want to have a category for them. IacobusAmor 18:32, 25 Ianuarii 2007 (UTC)
- Isidorus says in his Historia Gothorum Haeresis Ariana, Gregorius Turonensis says in his Decem Libri Historiarum Perfidia Arriana, Heresi Arriana and Arriani. what should we stick to then?--Xaverius 20:51, 22 Februarii 2007 (UTC)
- Well, seems like Haeresis Ariana is the best way to go, attestation-wise. Of course arianismus might be better npov-wise. --Iustinus 21:56, 22 Februarii 2007 (UTC)
- If we had Pelagianismus, Monophysismus and so, I would go for Arianismus, butfor the time being, Haeresis Ariana is the answer--Xaverius 22:04, 22 Februarii 2007 (UTC)
- Well, seems like Haeresis Ariana is the best way to go, attestation-wise. Of course arianismus might be better npov-wise. --Iustinus 21:56, 22 Februarii 2007 (UTC)
- Isidorus says in his Historia Gothorum Haeresis Ariana, Gregorius Turonensis says in his Decem Libri Historiarum Perfidia Arriana, Heresi Arriana and Arriani. what should we stick to then?--Xaverius 20:51, 22 Februarii 2007 (UTC)
- Likewise any of dozens of other named heresies, including (off the top of my head) Antinomianism, Donatism, Jansenism, Marcionism, Monophysitism, Nestorianism, Pelagianism, and Sabellianism. Vicipaedia might want to have a category for them. IacobusAmor 18:32, 25 Ianuarii 2007 (UTC)

