Disputatio:Haeresis Ariana

E Vicipaedia

Seems to me that Haeresia Ariana or even Arianismus would be better. --Iustinus 18:22, 25 Ianuarii 2007 (UTC)

There could be more than 1,500 years of Latin commentary on it, with ample attestations. Anybody got one at hand? IacobusAmor 18:26, 25 Ianuarii 2007 (UTC)
Likewise any of dozens of other named heresies, including (off the top of my head) Antinomianism, Donatism, Jansenism, Marcionism, Monophysitism, Nestorianism, Pelagianism, and Sabellianism. Vicipaedia might want to have a category for them. IacobusAmor 18:32, 25 Ianuarii 2007 (UTC)
Isidorus says in his Historia Gothorum Haeresis Ariana, Gregorius Turonensis says in his Decem Libri Historiarum Perfidia Arriana, Heresi Arriana and Arriani. what should we stick to then?--Xaverius 20:51, 22 Februarii 2007 (UTC)
Well, seems like Haeresis Ariana is the best way to go, attestation-wise. Of course arianismus might be better npov-wise. --Iustinus 21:56, 22 Februarii 2007 (UTC)
If we had Pelagianismus, Monophysismus and so, I would go for Arianismus, butfor the time being, Haeresis Ariana is the answer--Xaverius 22:04, 22 Februarii 2007 (UTC)