பயனர் பேச்சு:Ganeshk

கட்டற்ற கலைக்களஞ்சியமான விக்கிபீடியாவில் இருந்து.

பொருளடக்கம்

[தொகு] Welcome

Hi Ganesh. Welcome aboard. It's OK to discuss in English in Talk pages since you haven't learnt Tamil at school. And all the current users know English. Let me work with the other users to get the templates translated. -- Sundar \பேச்சு 07:06, 18 ஜூலை 2006 (UTC)

Ganesh, amazing work with the infobox. Regarding consensus you're right. Some wikipedians have reservations about the ratio of user-gerated pages to bot-generated pages and the impression it could generate in a random surfer. Their suggestion is to rate-limit the bot. For now, they're willing to try out towns and cities of Tamil Nadu. I hope that we'll be able to arrive at a consensus agreement in favour of using the bot on all towns soon. -- Sundar \பேச்சு 08:14, 18 ஜூலை 2006 (UTC)

[தொகு] Translations of state names

See இந்தியாவின் மாநிலங்களும் பிரதேசங்களும். -- Sundar \பேச்சு 09:08, 18 ஜூலை 2006 (UTC)

[தொகு] Welcome Ganeshk

Welcome Ganeshk

Your efforts and expertise are well appreciated. I think similar techniques can be adopted for adding standard information on other subject areas that are data base oriented as well.

As you would have noted taWpedia only has around 3300 articles, and it would overwhelm its article space if all the Indian towns (around 50 000???) are added. Thus, I suggested limiting to TN, which would be more useful to taWpedia users. Perhaps, we can extend that to other areas in India where Tamils live as well.

You approach issues with good sprit and open mindedness. TaWpedia will benefit from you contribution. Thanks and Good luck. --Natkeeran 13:21, 18 ஜூலை 2006 (UTC)

[தொகு] Thanks for the automation

Ganesh, Thank you so much for creating an automation for providing the basic details of all the the Indian towns. It is a great saving in time and a valuable set of data. Time can be spared for more creative writing rather than adding standard (but useful) mechanical details. Looking forward to see how it works in Tamil Wikipedia (so far it looks really excellent). Regards, Selva (C.R.Selvakumar from தமிழ் விக்கிபீடியா).

[தொகு] For Deletion of others work list it in the following page, for own just note in the talk page and in the summary

—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Natkeeran (talkcontribs) .

[தொகு] வாக்குச் சேகரிப்பு :)

கணேஷ்,

  • தமிழ் விக்கி மூலம் தளத்தை தொடங்குவதற்கான வாக்கெடுப்பு இங்கு நடக்கிறது. அதிகாரி பொறுப்புக்கும் என்னை சுய நியமனம் செய்து உள்ளேன். இன்னும் போதுமான வாக்குகள் கிடைக்கவில்லை. தங்கள் பொன்னான வாக்கை தவறாமல் செலுத்துமாறு அன்புடன் கேட்டுக் கொள்கிறேன் :)
  • ஏப்ரல் 2006லேயே தமிழ் விக்கி செய்திகள் தளத்தை தொடங்குவது குறித்த வேண்டுதலை உமாபதி இங்கு விடுத்துள்ளார். எனினும் உரிய கவனம் பெறாததால் இன்னும் போதுமான ஆதரவு வாக்குகள் பெறாமல் இருக்கிறது. அங்கும் சென்று வாக்களிக்குமாறு வேண்டுகிறேன்.

மேற்கண்ட தளங்களில் பயனர் பக்கங்களை உருவாக்கும் போது மறக்காமல் உங்கள் விக்கிபீடியா பயனர் பக்கங்களுக்கான இணைப்புகளை தாருங்கள்.

Ganesh, please follow the external links in this message to vote for new wikimedia project proposals in tamil language. Thanks --ரவி 10:06, 2 ஆகஸ்ட் 2006 (UTC)

[தொகு] Welcome Back

Hi Ganesh, Welcome back. :-) --Sivakumar \பேச்சு 05:52, 12 அக்டோபர் 2006 (UTC)

[தொகு] doubts

ganesh, recently we have moved two pages created by ganeshbot. can we delete the page titles that existed before moving? will this cause the bot to create the article on the same topic again? or will it be fixed if we change the name also in the town list u use for running the bot? Then, please indicate where we should make the change?

And, I guess u r a member of telugu wikipedia..do u have any idea how telugu wikipedia is creating so many articles in recent times? do u have hyper active memebers or generate bot articles? but generally i see the articles are of less content!!!--ரவி 08:03, 23 அக்டோபர் 2006 (UTC)

ganesh, thanks for the response. as per tamil wikipedia policy, We would rather delete those redirects as they are not alternate spellings but wrong spellings..There is no chance that someone search by that name..just a translaiteration mistake..--ரவி 17:39, 23 அக்டோபர் 2006 (UTC)

[தொகு] Adminship

Hi Ganesh. While I trust you for a good admin based on my experiences with you in English Wikipedia, I'd suggest that you wait a little longer before seeking adminship here. And I fully understand the itch to look for the admin tools that you're used to in English Wiki. :) In my opinion, you'll be one of the greatest assets in terms of admin tool usage. But, adminship has been associated with some discretionary tasks too. For that, it's important that you stay a little longer here doing "mop" jobs and gain the confidence of fellow editors. I think people would expect you to converse in Tamil where possible. If I were to give an opinion, I'd give you exemptions on some of these requirements and would give you access to sysop tools. By the way, thanks a ton for Ganeshbot. :) -- Sundar \பேச்சு 06:29, 25 அக்டோபர் 2006 (UTC)

Ganesh, glad to know that u will devote more time in local language wikis. people like u and sundar bring the culture and expertise from en wiki. Your not being able to converse in tamil is not a big problem. its more about the trust, reputation u gain in the community and how far u could contribute to admin tasks. i can say that u r already doing lot of things in that direction. after some time, some of us would be glad to nominate u for adminship. but if u visit frequently and read the tamil articles and discussionss, i am sure u can pick up ur tamil writing skills--ரவி 14:22, 25 அக்டோபர் 2006 (UTC)

Ravi, I should "never say never". Like you mention, frequenting here will help my tamil writing skills. I did not have any formal tamil learning. I managed to read the words. Hope to write some day too. Thanks, Ganeshk 04:54, 26 அக்டோபர் 2006 (UTC)

Ganesh, I am glad about your interest in working with us in TW more effectively. As you have experience in English wiki as an administrator, it is only beneficial for us to have you here in the same capacity. I am convinced, that you could involve meaningfully, even without the knowledge of Tamil. I also believe, there is enough room for a person like you to contribute towards the development of Tamil Wikipedia. However, I share the openion expresed by Sundar and Ravi in asking you to wait a little before one of us propose you for adminship. Mayooranathan 16:25, 25 அக்டோபர் 2006 (UTC)

Mayooranathan, Thanks so much for your comments. -- Ganeshk 04:54, 26 அக்டோபர் 2006 (UTC)

[தொகு] Bot only upto "P"

Hi Ganesh. Have you stopped the bot with towns whose name start with "P"? If so, can you please run it on the remaining names. I'm waiting for சோழவந்தான் to be created. :) -- Sundar \பேச்சு 10:27, 30 அக்டோபர் 2006 (UTC)

[தொகு] Tamil Nadu towns

My understanding is that Tamil Nadu villages and towns are given priority. Is there a separate list consisting of TN villages and towns and cities? Thanks. --Natkeeran 18:38, 30 அக்டோபர் 2006 (UTC)

I created TN districts and TN towns per your request. -- Ganeshk 22:41, 30 அக்டோபர் 2006 (UTC)

Thank you. --Natkeeran 01:00, 31 அக்டோபர் 2006 (UTC)

[தொகு] see

see பேச்சு:அடூர்--Ravidreams 23:03, 17 நவம்பர் 2006 (UTC)

[தொகு] taWpedia Assessment System: Quality and Importance Markers

Is it possible to provide some details as how we might be able to go about implementing Assessment System at taWpedia? Thanks. --Natkeeran 21:01, 18 நவம்பர் 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for the feedback. My preference would be create a unique Assessment System process than to just duplicate the enWpedia system. However, I will not be surprised if we end up doing just that. Of course easy implementation and maintenance are always two important factors. I will study and work on your suggestions and will get back to you soon. --Natkeeran 21:54, 18 நவம்பர் 2006 (UTC)

we had been talking a lot throughout this year about quality watch. but i think it is still too early to conduct a quality assessment mainly because of the lack of enough quality contributors. Rather than spending time to label articles as good or bad or best, we would rather spend that time in updrading the article content and quality. Simple tips to improve the quality - copyedit the article, no spelling mistakes, add interwiki links, pictures, category and appropriate external links. After we carry out this exercise, then we can think about the quality assessment system may be at the end of 2007 ! First we should try to improve the quality and then assess how far we have fared ! --Ravidreams 00:59, 19 நவம்பர் 2006 (UTC)

Ravi, I think the assessment process can happen in parallel to the quality improvement. Like the Bangla link mentioned, right now there is no way to find out what are the top articles that need to be improved. There is no statistic to see how we are doing. I feel asessment and improvement go hand-in-hand. -- Ganeshk 01:53, 19 நவம்பர் 2006 (UTC)

[தொகு] Citizendium

I notice you you been adding links to Citizendium. I hope you understand Citizendium is not a Wikipedia partner, and Larry Sanger who started Citizendim is a vocal-critic of Wikipedia and had left Wikipedia due to differences with Jimbo Wales. Links to Citizendium should be restricted articles such Larry Sanger, Criticism of Wikipedia. It should be no way linked to our policies and guidelines. Regards, Ganeshk 23:23, 18 நவம்பர் 2006 (UTC)

I am aware of the background. I just thought it might be a helpful External link; however, there is room for mis interpretation. So, I have removed it, and added to a general page to monitor criticism of wikipedia. It would be helthy for us to monitor the criticisms and adjust where appropriate. Regards, --Natkeeran 23:29, 18 நவம்பர் 2006 (UTC)


Thank you for the link and the comments. Yes, I also believe that knowledge should be free and open. I also respect, trust, and value the role of ‘experts’. I usually do not like extreme forms of “credentialism”, and dislike people who become arrogant and unapproachable as they accumulate credentials.

I can not pass a judment on Citizendium right now, as they are going to licence under GNU GPL. It should be noted that the enWpedia and taWpedia do have different dynamics at play. For instance, we do not have much copy righted content in Tamil avilable on net. Also, the reach of the Internet is limited to upper and middle class people. (I am not saying that is healthy, I am just noting some observations.) Thus, the people who are able to contribute have taWpedia are filted for better of worse to enthusiastic students and volunteers. It is the present situation now, of course time will change the scene.

Trust but verify is usually my approach to Wpedia or any source of info. We operate under the Best Effort Quality Policy, and not under Guaranteed Quality Policy, and we should make the explicit to the users.

Also, scan through the following link I came across: bn:উইকিপেডিয়া:প্রশাসকদের আলোচনাসভা. It seems everyone has started to worry about quality now. So, it is time for taWpedia Assessment System as well.

Regards,--Natkeeran 00:41, 19 நவம்பர் 2006 (UTC)

Natkeeran, that link on bangla wiki was good. also, it is ok to add a reference to citizendium in the news about wikipedia section. Only after seeing that i came to know about citizendium. Info about such things make us keep a watch on ourselves.--Ravidreams 00:59, 19 நவம்பர் 2006 (UTC)

[தொகு] note , request

ganesh, unless it is a controverisal page with some content, u need not nominate it for deletion. just a leave a note for deletion in the talk page. that will be enough.--Ravidreams 10:55, 19 நவம்பர் 2006 (UTC)

also could you give us a link to relevant help page for using AWB or help create such a guide? it will be useful for people like me, gopi, balaji who are active in organising this site. Thanks--Ravidreams 11:06, 19 நவம்பர் 2006 (UTC)