토론:친일파
위키백과 ― 우리 모두의 백과사전.
亲日派 is simplified Chinese only while 親日派 is traditional Chinese. I cannot type Korean, so I post this talk in English.--Jusjih 2007년 2월 5일 (월) 02:51 (KST)
- OK, I corrected it. ―에멜무지로 (nfj4alf·'vyvs·kdje·lta;v·kdyvx·icjdw) 2007년 2월 5일 (월) 03:01 (KST)
- Thank you, but is it possible to distinguish traditional and simplified Chinese?--Jusjih 2007년 2월 6일 (화) 02:16 (KST)
[편집] NOT ALL CHINILPAS WERE EVIL
There must be people who forced to serve Japanese colonial regime or Japanese Empire with very strict oppression.It is not appropriate to regard all chinilpas as "traitors".
For example, Li Gwangsu wrote lots of pro-Japanese books claim that Korean must throw away their culture at all.I would not claim that he was correct in any sense,but we must understand that he claimed "naeseon-ilche" to achieve Koreans' equality comparing with Japanese.As you know he had once a good activist of korean liberation movement, but he was got despaired with overwhelming Japanese power and throw away the hope of Korean liberation.It was Japanese Empire and violent colonial oppression that made him a chinilpa.
We should feel sympathy or mercy to people who forced to be chinilpas in the highly oppressive colonial regime. Ofcourse I agree that some people like Li Wanyong can not be defended.222.225.181.227 2007년 5월 20일 (일) 00:03 (KST)

