Disputatio Formulae:Discretiva - Vicipaedia

# Disputatio Formulae:Discretiva

### E Vicipaedia

## [recensere] Future image commons:Image:Disambig.png

- Halló friends! Please take a look at de:Bild:Logo Begriffsklärung.png, en:Image:Disambig fork.png, nl:Image:Begripsverklaring.png and sv:Bild:Trisambig poseidon.jpg.
- Which do you prefer?
- Please answer at the oldest (?) discussion page de:Bild Diskussion:Logo Begriffsklärung.png. Thanks! Best regards Gangleri 11:48 mar 11, 2005 (UTC)

## [recensere] layout (taken from Disputatio Vicipaediae:Discretiva)

As said above, the discretiva-template could offer more information. I'll try to give an example:

Haec est pagina discretiva.
Scilicet, quae indicat alias paginas quae nomen idem habere possent.

- Haec pagina categorias non habet.
- Non semper potest ut haec pagina nexus intervicos habet.
- Haec pagina solum nexus et breves descriptiones habet.
- Adde formulam {{disambig}} ad paginas relatas.

Quaeso, pone hanc formulam in initio paginae (quid est consilium novum).

The template shall clearly indicate that this is a special type of page. The green background shall indicate that everything is ok. The grey icon is good, in my opinion, because red colours might irritate the reader. What do you think? --Roland (disp.) 23:01, 1 Novembris 2006 (UTC)

  P. S.: After all cleanup is done, we might want to have a smaller template. --Roland (disp.) 09:54, 4 Novembris 2006 (UTC)

    It looks very good, and I like the colours, but I agree it could be smaller. A nd rew D alby 12:53, 4 Novembris 2006 (UTC)

| Haec est pagina discretiva. Scilicet, quae indicat alias paginas quae nomen idem habere possent. Quaeso, pone hanc formulam in initio paginae (quid est consilium novum, vide Vicipaedia:Discretiva).

Ok, so smaller. ;-) I've moved the hints to Vicipaedia:Discretiva. Now I'll start to move the templates to the top of the pages. The layout of the template can be changed at any time, if someone wants: {{discretiva}} --Roland (disp.) 13:27, 4 Novembris 2006 (UTC)

  Shouldn't that possent be possint? But why subjunctive? Would possunt be better? But then, for habere possunt, would habent be better? (We know that the pages do, in fact, have the same name.) And why are you saying alias paginas instead of just plain paginas? For alias, would varias be better? But can't paginas all by itself suffice? (Sorry I don't have answers today: just questions!) IacobusAmor 13:49, 4 Novembris 2006 (UTC)

    It seems there have some things to be corrected ... ;-) --14:33, 4 Novembris 2006 (UTC)

## [recensere] edit

1. Quod not quid is relative pronoun.
2. To say "at the top" is formed with an adjective in latin, not with a noun and a genitive.
3. Cleaned up the first sentence.

--Ioshus (disp) 17:59, 4 Novembris 2006 (UTC)

Receptum de "http://la.wikipedia.org../../../d/i/s/Disputatio_Formulae%7EDiscretiva_6eb2.html"

Categoriae: Formulae | Discretiva

##### Views

- Formula
- Disputatio
- Emendatio recentissima

##### communitas

- Invitatio
- Taberna
- Adiutatum
- Donationes

##### Quaerere